Skip to main content

Open ideas have been reviewed by our Product Management and are open for commenting and voting.

Filter by idea status

Filter by product area

4588 Ideas

Improve FME Server Installer with optional advanced Database Options for DistribReleased

***Note from Migration:*** Original Title was: Improve FME Server Installer with optional advanced Database Options for Distributed DB With the increasing use of Distributed and Fault Tolerant Environments the installer lacks the ability to customize the FME Server System Database connection settings and provides only basic settings (host & port). In High Availability and Fault Tolerant environments these are typically not enough and users must edit config files to complete the connection settings. (in +2020.0 this is now two files).The FME Server System Database can be stored in SQL Server, Oracle, & PostgreSQL. The drivers used are Java based and the installer provides hostname and port options. The installer could be expanded to provide optional jdbc parameters much like the FME Workbench Database Connection dialog does when using the JDBC Reader/Writer format.The SQL Server database is most often requiring this customization the JDBC Parameters. Some examples are:serverName=<hostname>databaseName=<databasename>instanceName=<instancename>portNumber=<#####>MultisubnetFailover=trueintegratedSecurity=trueIt is proposed when performing a Distributed Database (or FT) install that adding a drop down to select the database type and provide options (check boxes) to include additional connection string parameters to add to the config file. (or type in manual parameters) would be helpful and reduce the need to edit config files after installation completes.Related Ideas:SQL Server and Dynamic Port Allocation https://community.safe.com/s/idea/0874Q000000TlFqQAK/detailSQL Server and Windows Authentication https://community.safe.com/s/idea/0874Q000000TlbHQAS/detail

Password protected/encrypted zip, 7-zip, rar or even pdf file transformersOpen

After a recent FME webinar I posed the idea to the FME team during the webinar about accessing password protected zip files. For example if you receive or work with zip files that are stored in a common directory, or are sent to you via some mechanism, either email, or a sharepoint site, or some internal corporate drive location, or even google drive or dropbox, but for some level of security the zip file is password protected, I think there might be some appetite to streamline the process of accessing this data to update an organizations databases. Since the contents of the zip file are encrypted, it's not likely to go to ArcGIS Online as a open data source, but could ultimately make it's way into a ArcGIS Enterprise internal corporate portal. Being able to have a checkbox for password protection, should enable an entry box for password entry. Now the type of encryption options used, would be those supported by the common compression software, e.g. winzip, winrar and 7-zip at the very least, and yes when I state "zip" file, it should also include ".rar" and ".7z". Since there is no fundamental incompatibility that I'm aware of to incorporate this capability in FME, even at this point as an optional transformer for download in beta to see if there's a desire for full production release, I'm wondering if there is any appetite? Since FME can already read zip files and even KMZ, which is a zipped KML file, there should be no fundamental problem incorporating password access. Even incorporating secure authorized access via password authentication or digital signature of encrypted PDFs should be investigated. I'm sure Adobe would work with Safe, even though they might require some hefty licencing fees? Adobe tends to be very heavy handed with the user only using their tools and portals for digital secure authentication.

FME AR feature attribution and modification that inserts/deletes/updates featureOpen

***Note from Migration:*** Original Title was: FME AR feature attribution and modification that inserts/deletes/updates features in a database Someone has previously posted regarding adding feature attribution to the AR models. If this becomes a reality, what I am proposing is a way for an individual to add/delete/modify features. These modifications can then be pushed back to FME Server/Cloud and validated and inserted/deleted/updated in a connected database. It would also be nice if the models could be password protected so that only certain organizational roles are able to do any modification to the existing model.I'll provide an example of what I have in mind. I work for a telecommunications design company and we have numerous field technicians/PMs across various projects in the US. Presently, our data is collected and then reconciled through an FME workspace. Any updates to the field collected data, whether it's adding an attribute value or collecting a new feature, needs to go through the validation step. However, it would be great if the technicians/PM were able to modify the features within the AR app and after submitting the changes, a workspace is triggered to validate the changes. I'm trying to get our field crew interested in FME AR as I see a lot of utility in visualizing the outside plant features, particularly buried features, but I'm getting pushback because FME AR is a different app than what we're presently using and they don't want to keep switching between apps.