Skip to main content

Open ideas have been reviewed by our Product Management and are open for commenting and voting.

Filter by idea status

Filter by product area

4563 Ideas

Terminator improvementsReleased

Some general improvements for the Terminator transformer I am thinking of:The ability to terminate with a FME_FAILURE or ABORTED or maybe even a new TERMINATED status (relevant for Server). An FME_FAILURE happens when FME crashes or experiences some other problem (e.g. missing transformer). When the Terminator caused the workspace to quit, this typically happens because of a "user handled exception", which might also be interpreted as a cancellation, but now it's always FME_FAILURE as well. Either way, it gives me better insight in what went wrong if this status type could be changed.The ability to set custom data that should be sent upon failure, which can then be used as the "Data To Post" for notification topics. Upon failure, nothing gets written to the "Data To Post" writer, but it would be nice if we could at least get something back. In this case, that would be the custom data that was set in the Terminator.I would like the error message that I specified in the Terminator to stay exactly the way it is. When a job terminates on Server, it passes the Termination Message on to the statusMessage attribute from the job result. Just like in workbench, it always prefixes this message with "<Transformer Name>: Aborting Translation as directed by mapping file. Message is ...". I would love to see that prefix removed, because now I need to remove it myself since it is confusing to an end user who is not familiar with FME. Might as well officially integrate the functionality of the MessageLogger by 1Spatial.Any other suggestions...?

ifitch
Contributor
ifitchContributor

Improving the Production Quality of FME Tip VideosNew

I've noticed that the Safe Software YouTube channel has recently started publishing more short tips, tricks, and workflow videos, which is great to see. I really appreciate the effort to create more educational content for the FME community.I do have a few suggestions that I think could make these videos even more engaging and effective.1. Audio qualityThe biggest issue, in my opinion, is the sound quality. It often sounds like it was recorded with a fairly basic microphone and includes noticeable background noise. Since audio quality has a huge impact on viewer retention, investing in a better microphone, cleaner recording setup, or basic audio post-processing would make a significant difference.2. Editing and pacingMany videos feel longer than necessary. Tips that could often be explained in 30–60 seconds are sometimes stretched to 3–5 minutes. Today's audiences are used to concise, information-dense content, so tighter editing and faster pacing would likely make the videos more useful and easier to watch.3. Overall production qualityThe videos would also benefit from a more polished production style. A simple screen recording is useful, but adding zoom-ins, highlights, annotations, quick cuts, clearer structure, or occasional graphics would help viewers focus on the key points.If video production is not a primary focus for the internal team, it might be worth collaborating with someone who specializes in educational video production, YouTube content, or short-form technical content. Even a small improvement in production quality could make the videos feel more professional and help present FME in the best possible light.The technical content itself is valuable. I simply think that better audio, tighter editing, faster pacing, and a more polished presentation would help these videos reach a wider audience and make them more enjoyable to watch.Thanks again for creating more content for the FME community. I hope you'll continue publishing more videos.