Shape the future of FME with your ideas
Open ideas have been reviewed by our Product Management and are open for commenting and voting.
The internets suggest they're a GeoTIFF file, but when I force them to read into FME as a GeoTIFF it loads weirdly (looks as though it's loading multiple pyramid levels on top of one another?)
As mentioned in this question and discussed in the answers, it is now almost impossible to make FME export an XML document with a <![CDATA[ ]]> section a.k. literal character data.My intended use was to communicate some HTML-formatted descriptive text in a XML-response about the capabilities of a transformation. This can thus be presented to the end user of the application communicating with my service.My preferred implementation would be to add a XQuery function in the XMLTemplaterget-attributeget-xml-attributeget-cdata-attributeKind regards,Martin
It can bit a bit of a hazzle working to improve existing custom transfomer. To be able to save the custom transfomer in a new version, you have to close down the project open it up, to be able to select modify as new version, this is tricky if you have already started to modify the existing transformer and you don't want changes to the existing version. What would be nice would be an option to save as "new version", and an option in the workbench to update the custom transformer to a newer version.
It would be great if FME could monitor log files of one database, and when a transaction occurs, relay that change to another type of database in real time.
As data storage and transfer costs are billed in addition to the FME Cloud instance cost, it would be handy to be able to track usage over time. The current Billing Dashboard provides month-to-date metrics but it would be nice to be able to see daily transfer and storage usage (in KB/MB/GB, rather than - or in addition to - $USD). This information could be displayed in a graph or table. See this question for further details: https://knowledge.safe.com/questions/75739/fme-cloud-data-transfer-statistics-reporting.html
Supporting Netcdf4 format. Trying to work with Sentinel 5p data and it is only manageable using netcdf4 python module, R netcdf4 library or SNAP management tool. It would be nice to handle data directly in FME!!!!
How about adding the ability to protect/encrypt zip files created in the FME Server download service to provide security for sensitive data. Security, can never have enough.
HiI need to append a lot of different file (XLS CSV SHP) and output a unique csv table but I would like to remove as first step all the fields present in my input that doesn't contain any valuemaybe an option in the Attribute manager .......thxFrancesco
Since it is possible, and nobody has posted it yet. What about a Movie Reader/Writer (MPEG, WMW, AVI, MOV...)?It can be done today with use of third party builds like ffmpeg, so why not add it to FME.
The FMEServerResourceConnector is a fantastic transformer for working with resources on FMEServer but it lacks the ability to create new folders.Even when uploading a file, the path that the file is being uploaded to must already exist, which means that it needs to either be created manually through the web interface, or by using the FME Server REST API. The probem with using the REST API (via an HTTPCaller) is that it cannot be used with a named web connection, so you need to mess around with Tokens, etc. for authorisation.It would be great if the FMEServerResourceConnector could be enhanced to either:add the capability to explicitly create a folderadd the capability to specify a path for an uploaded file, with that path being created if it doesn't already exist.Additionally, the error returned when something goes wrong with the transformer could do with some attention. The only error that seems to get reported back, regardless of what went wrong, is, "fme_rejection_code: ERROR_DURING_PROCESSING", which really doesn't help at all.
In FME 2016 the AttributeClassifier has been deprecated in favour of the AttributeValidator. I agree that the AttributeValidator is the future but unless I'm mistaken it doesn't yet carry the full volume of tests previously offered by the AttributeClassifier?Of course you can get the old AttributeClassifier from an old Workspace, but we shouldn't have to do that really.None of the other Transformers that the AttributeValidator is designed to supersede have been deprecated yet, so can the decision be reversed, for the time being at least?
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.