Skip to main content

Open ideas have been reviewed by our Product Management and are open for commenting and voting.

Filter by idea status

Filter by product area

4589 Ideas

fgiron
Enthusiast
fgironEnthusiast

Richer User Parameters Prompt UIReleased

It would be great if you could generate a richer Parameters Prompt when using the Prompt and Run mode. For example, you could have different parameters depending on the value of one of them, or group them, or have possible values depending on others, etc. Maybe having subsequent dialogs could be a way of doing it. See:http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/97762/fme-c...Merged Ideas:User Parameters with conditional values by fgiron on January 8, 2016If I want to set a private parameter dependent on a published one, I have to use a "script" parameter type. It would be nice to be able to choose a "conditional" type directly. Now you can only use conditional values in user parameters when setting them from transformers that have the Conditional Value option (https://knowledge.safe.com/questions/3477/published-parameter-with-conditional-values.html).Custom Transformer UI Generation by fmelizard on October 29, 2015Allow richer layout (grouping, etc) within custom transformer parameter UIsDynamic published parameters by tlabs on April 18, 2019It would be nice to have Published Parameters auto-populate based on another published parameter.Example:There are 2 published parameters1. Type: Text. Name: Airport Code. Input: CAB52. Type: Coordinate System Name. Name: Coordinate System. Input: WGS84-ABBOTSFORD-CAB5User inputs Airport Code CAB5, and the Coordinate System would automatically select the above listed Coord Sys because there is only 1 coordinate system associated with that Airport Code.Allow User Parameters to be grouped into sections. by sam.mcdonald on October 25, 2020I believe it would be beneficial for end users if groups or sections could be created for User Parameters, which would segregate them into logical groups in the Server UI and Desktop Translation Parameters popup. Examples could be input files and output folders sections, and so on.Please refer to the Layers.png image for a quick edit I did of the Server UI to demonstrate this. Collapsable public parameter by todd_davis on October 17, 2017In a number of situations there can be public parameter in either a workbench/custom transformer that may only need to be changed on the rare occasion (e.g. the default value will likely be used). I have instances where a transformer/workbench, may have over 10 parameters because of what a client wants in terms of options, and in most occasions they will really be dealing with say 4. The extra parameters can lead to confusion, or users not updating the correct parameters because of the crowded interface.I am hoping that an extra checkbox could be added next to the "optional" and "published" in the parameter definition. Ticking this checkbox would mean that when a run/transformer dialog was shown that the parameters would be found in a collapsed "Advanced" section.It would certain tidy up the interface, but still allow as many options as people wanted.Ability to set parameter relationships by 1spatialdave on February 8, 2016Occasionally when creating parameters to control a workspace it would be nice to be able to create a relationship between parameters to make it clear to the user running the process which parameters to set. For example if a user selects from a choice parameter that they would like to do a proximity search against restaurants, two additional parameters that were by default greyed out should then become available so that the user can enter a parameter value for the maximum number of results to be returned and enter the search radius. Its the kind of detail that could be applied when the parameter is created, like, 'set parameter as primary' and then you could add 'child' parameters to that primary.Allow group the parameters by taojunabc on October 27, 2016For a complex workspace, the user may have many parameters, the current FME does not allow the user to group parameters, but when many of the parameters, the parameter input dialog will be relatively messy. Hope to be able to allow the user to group parameters.Conditional parameters by chrisw84 on May 31, 2017I've had an internal client ask if FME/server could include parameters that appear/disappear or even change selectable values based upon parameters selected ahead of them. We have the ability to make parameters optional already, so can this be toggled dynamically?

Support for Flexible Image Transport System (fits) format please? (Astronomy)Released

Hi everyone!Is there any chance we could see support for the fits (.fits, .fit, .fts ) format, it's a format used by professional and amateur astronomers, and some other parts of the scientific community. Some info here:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FITSand here:https://fits.gsfc.nasa.gov/fits_documentation.htmland here:https://photographingspace.com/how-to-use-fits/Libraries for it are available here:https://fits.gsfc.nasa.gov/fits_libraries.htmlIt's an open format, free to use.I would *love* to get FME to process/automate this stuff. After an observing session, I end up with thousands images and gigabytes of data, each in a separate R,G,B and L channel, which I have to sort and process and then recombine into a colour RGB image. It literally takes me hours and hours to do.Typically I use a program like deepsky stacker or registax, but it is pretty labour intensive at times. We have to register the images, so that they are properly aligned (objects move even when tracking them, so the software learns to keeps the same stars lined up for each image) and then stacked to boost the signal to noise ratio. They get aligned so that they don't appear smeared out. I would provide a sample fits image but it's not supported here for upload! :(Happy to go into further detail, and answer any questions.Thanks!

phoeffler
Supporter
phoefflerSupporter

Use item IDs to specify ArcGIS Online and Portal for ArcGIS itemsReleased

We use FME Desktop and FME Server to manage important processes that read from and write to ArcGIS Online (and to a lesser degree Portal for ArcGIS / ArcGIS Enterprise). The interface to specify an item for ArcGIS Online readers and writers has improved dramatically in recent versions. A major limitation is that items are specified using a group name and the item name. It appears that more recently the item ID is also incorporated, which will help to resolve conflicts if items and/or groups have the same name. It seems that folders within an owners content may also be used in lieu of groups, which is convenient, but when used to specify an item, only adds to the issue described below.We propose that ArcGIS Online items should only be specified by their ID in readers and writers. The ID is unique and constant, and is how Esri references and manages content within their systems. It's also how other third-party vendors often reference items. We'd still like to be able to search by item name, but as a large organization, there are various circumstances where item names need to change. These changes currently cause process breakage in FME and require significant re-work.Please consider this for future releases of FME. We're happy to provide additional information, if helpful. If it is currently possible to specify items solely by their ID, we're interested in that.