Shape the future of FME with your ideas
Open ideas have been reviewed by our Product Management and are open for commenting and voting.
Ability to run a batch script using automation as an action
Currently, when editing an automation you can right-click on a Workspace action and go to View Workspace to see what the workspace is doing. When the automation is started right-clicking on the action does nothing. It would be very handy to be able to check this without having to navigate through the View Workspace menu.
Currently if using a FeatureWriter to write a shapefile, the information in the summary attributes includes the folder location (dataset) and the filename (feature_type) but nothing to indicate that it was a shapefile and associated sidecar files written. It would be helpful if this information could be automatically included/exposed
Please upvote GitHub Issue to develop Cesium Ion API so it is possible to update assets and FME be able to develop CesiumIonConnector for this kind of POST requests
Often I want to copy the name of the source dataset in the reader. Easy enough with the writers but not able to be done with readers.
Per this article: https://knowledge.safe.com/articles/87453/getting-started-with-automations.html Automations display their errors/warnings on the Automations management page under the Status column. The number of errors/warnings displayed is calculated from the total number in the log file. If you want to view current errors you need to view the log file and if you always only want current errors you'd need to remember to clear the log file.It would be great if there was an option (or change default behaviour) to only have errors/warnings from the latest Automation run displayed in the Manage screen. This would make it much simpler to tell at a glance if the latest Automation run has any issues, rather than having to remember how many errors were reported last time you looked at the page.If you need to see errors/warnings from previous Automation runs you can always look in the log file...
Hello,I wounder if it would be possible to develope feature query of sketchup trait for setting angle between normals and controlling smooth normals and soften coplanar. The intended usage is to write a sketchupfile as a template with buildings and terrain with different angle between normals for visual effect and easer reading of those geometries by controlling visibility of edges on object level. Another trait request, if it's not available already would be to set a sketchup group (geometry name in GeometryPropertySetter) to be locked. Manually done in sketchup by right clicking the group and choose locked. This would also add to the value of a properly set sketchup template written from fme.Thanks!
Snowflake cloud data warehouse is in use by some big customers and connects well with BI tools, so lets read and write it.
At the moment when you click 'update' in the Workbench 'Packages' UI, it immediately updates the package polling the web and grabbing the latest content. The first time I did this I was surprised because that's an inconsistent approach with the very risk averse approach that's been taken around upgrading transformers where you get warned about proceeding and you get to check what's changed in the UI. To find out the changes with the package you need to know to go to the Hub.Safe.com and go and look at the changes there. Can we have a 'View Changes' button for packages in Workbench please?
Along the lines of this idea and this idea, but I would really love FME to be able to support PBR materials as appearances.With modern 3D formats like GLTF (and 3DTiles) gaining popularity and wider use, it would be really nice to have some way to support PBR material types. I wouldn't expect the Data Inspector to render based on these, although that would be very cool. It seems like it is pretty difficult to interchange between the two types of materials so being able to support PBR materials would allow for better preservation of the original dataset.At the moment, there is no real way to properly preserve a file which carries a PBR material, I must convert these back into a standard appearance, losing information.
Related to the FME Server 2017 "running job expiry time" (tm_ttc) parameter that cancels a job if it runs beyond a specified length of time: https://knowledge.safe.com/idea/18984/configure-time-limits-for-a-job-and-alertcancel-if.html ----- I'd very much like to have the ability to set a global time limit. Would the same/similar functionality be available as system wide defaults (e.g. max threshold of like 12 hours).
I'd like to see a mechanism to filter the advanced value handling in the AttributeCreator. If I'm reading in hundreds of features from different files, I would only want "feature[+1]" to read from the next row IF the filename matches too. I'm currently fixing this by saving feature[+1].fme_basename and running through a Tester, but a "Group By" or something on the AttributeCreator might be cleaner?
It would be nice to be able to lock the position of objects in workspaces, e.g. transformers, readers, writers. Sometimes when I am selecting and/or moving objects in large workspaces I move something unintentionally. It would be nice to be able to lock the layout of completed areas. It would be cool if this could be done at the bookmark level.
Currently after creating a Resource Connection on FME Server, in order to work with the FME Server macros $() when authoring workspaces I must create a Private Parameter or else transformers will display as red when I reference these. I would like the option to instead create an FME Server Parameter. This would be helpful as it means I can create a parameter for my new resource once only and it will then be available across all my workspaces, instead of having to create a private parameter every time I want to work with this.
Writing in Excel files, Like the HYPERLINK (see https://knowledge.safe.com/comments/35259/view.html )It would be nice to define a commentary over a value fieldE.g. value -> measurement / value.comment -> remark about measurement.It would avoid too large sections between the lines for big comments when they are shown as a column.
Try and make resource browsing experience closer to what you would expect from a file browser. - Altered UI/UX to a more familiar file navigation experience for users (similar to file navigation on the computer)- File tree to allow quickly dive deep into folders- Bookmarking folders for quick access from the file tree- Quickly create new folders in directories without the need of filling several fields- Right-click to quickly copy and paste files/folders
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.