Using the transformer "ExifReader" I read out various data of all images of a flight mission (e.g. name, file size, image dimension, GPS position). These files are stored in different directories. The goal is, if all captured images meet the requirements. This works fine for the individual images, but I'm not able to check if the correct number of images are taken for each point. In the case of a common recording point (simultaneous triggering of several cameras at the same recording point) the GPS position is identical, but the names are different (different cameras). Now I'm looking for a way to check if there are enough photos at the same point.
+24- Supporter
Is this drone-images? You need to "group by" camera_name. For instance you can use a Statisticscalculator PER gps-position and then group by camera_name to get
+7- Contributor
sigtill wrote:
Is this drone-images? You need to "group by" camera_name. For instance you can use a Statisticscalculator PER gps-position and then group by camera_name to get
Thank you very much for your support. Together with the Transformer "Statisticscalculator" I get the desired result and can now check if there is the correct number of images for each recording point. Only with the structure I still have my problems. Currently I have the following structure:
NameCameraPositionO_C0198_11-01-44.418_02306__6041.IIQML000198+46.162141200000001, +6.155236000000000F_C0200_11-01-44.418_02298__6043.IIQML000200+46.162141200000001, +6.155236000000000B_C0204_11-01-44.418_02294__6043.IIQML000204+46.162141200000001, +6.155236000000000R_C0205_11-01-44.418_02300__6043.IIQML000205+46.162141200000001, +6.155236000000000L_C0222_11-02-58.000_00364_376.IIQML000222+46.162141200000001, +6.155236000000000O_C0198_11-01-41.088_02305__6040.IIQML000198+46.163379499999998, +6.153361900000000F_C0200_11-01-41.088_02297__6042.IIQML000200+46.163379499999998, +6.153361900000000B_C0204_11-01-41.088_02293__6042.IIQML000204+46.163379499999998, +6.153361900000000R_C0205_11-01-41.088_02299__6042.IIQML000205+46.163379499999998, +6.153361900000000L_C0222_11-02-55.000_00363_375.IIQML000222+46.163379499999998, +6.153361900000000
However, I rather need the corresponding images (name) from the recording point (position) myself, like this:
IDPositionImages6041+46.162141200000001, +6.155236000000000
O_C0198_11-01-44.418_02306__6041.IIQ;F_C0200_11-01-44.418_02298__6043.IIQ;
B_C0204_11-01-44.418_02294__6043.IIQ;R_C0205_11-01-44.418_02300__6043.IIQ;
L_C0222_11-02-58.000_00364_376.IIQ
6040
+46.163379499999998, +6.153361900000000
L_C0222_11-02-58.000_00364_376.IIQ; F_C0200_11-01-41.088_02297__6042.IIQ;
B_C0204_11-01-41.088_02293__6042.IIQ; R_C0205_11-01-41.088_02299__6042.IIQ;
L_C0222_11-02-55.000_00363_375.IIQ
Is there a possibility for this data restructuring in FME?
PS: It's not a drone project, but similar. It is an aerial photography project taken with an airplane and a multi-head system.
+39- Influencer
alfons wrote:
Thank you very much for your support. Together with the Transformer "Statisticscalculator" I get the desired result and can now check if there is the correct number of images for each recording point. Only with the structure I still have my problems. Currently I have the following structure:
NameCameraPositionO_C0198_11-01-44.418_02306__6041.IIQML000198+46.162141200000001, +6.155236000000000F_C0200_11-01-44.418_02298__6043.IIQML000200+46.162141200000001, +6.155236000000000B_C0204_11-01-44.418_02294__6043.IIQML000204+46.162141200000001, +6.155236000000000R_C0205_11-01-44.418_02300__6043.IIQML000205+46.162141200000001, +6.155236000000000L_C0222_11-02-58.000_00364_376.IIQML000222+46.162141200000001, +6.155236000000000O_C0198_11-01-41.088_02305__6040.IIQML000198+46.163379499999998, +6.153361900000000F_C0200_11-01-41.088_02297__6042.IIQML000200+46.163379499999998, +6.153361900000000B_C0204_11-01-41.088_02293__6042.IIQML000204+46.163379499999998, +6.153361900000000R_C0205_11-01-41.088_02299__6042.IIQML000205+46.163379499999998, +6.153361900000000L_C0222_11-02-55.000_00363_375.IIQML000222+46.163379499999998, +6.153361900000000
However, I rather need the corresponding images (name) from the recording point (position) myself, like this:
IDPositionImages6041+46.162141200000001, +6.155236000000000
O_C0198_11-01-44.418_02306__6041.IIQ;F_C0200_11-01-44.418_02298__6043.IIQ;
B_C0204_11-01-44.418_02294__6043.IIQ;R_C0205_11-01-44.418_02300__6043.IIQ;
L_C0222_11-02-58.000_00364_376.IIQ
6040
+46.163379499999998, +6.153361900000000
L_C0222_11-02-58.000_00364_376.IIQ; F_C0200_11-01-41.088_02297__6042.IIQ;
B_C0204_11-01-41.088_02293__6042.IIQ; R_C0205_11-01-41.088_02299__6042.IIQ;
L_C0222_11-02-55.000_00363_375.IIQ
Is there a possibility for this data restructuring in FME?
PS: It's not a drone project, but similar. It is an aerial photography project taken with an airplane and a multi-head system.
You can aggregate by Position, and choose to concatenate the Name attribute
+7- Contributor
ebygomm wrote:
You can aggregate by Position, and choose to concatenate the Name attribute
Thanks a lot, for this superfast and perfect reply. Works perfect 8-)
Reply
Rich Text Editor, editor1
Editor toolbars
Press ALT 0 for help
Helpful Members This Week
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.