Skip to main content
Solved

How to avoid deleting small polygons when using Generalizer ?


Forum|alt.badge.img
I have a dataset containing large and small polygons. When I generalized the layer, preserving the shared boudnaries, small pieces get deleted.

 

 

Is there w way to avoid deleting small polygons ?

Best answer by gio

Apart form filtering small sized polygons.

 

The various generalising schemes have options to control the amount of generalizing.

 

If u have it generalise to much, small objects will enter the range of generalisation and be removed altogether.

 

 

So its about tolerances, smoothingfactors, angels etc.. Experiment with these will help.

 

 

Gio

 

View original
Did this help you find an answer to your question?
This post is closed to further activity.
It may be a question with a best answer, an implemented idea, or just a post needing no comment.
If you have a follow-up or related question, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.

5 replies

david_r
Celebrity
  • April 16, 2014
Hi,

 

 

that would probably depend on the algorithm selected in the Generalizer.

 

 

Which algorithms have you tried?

 

 

David

Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Author
  • April 16, 2014
I use Douglas

 

 

Thanks

Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Author
  • April 16, 2014
The best result is when I use Douglas. Other algorithm still removed objects.

 

 

However, I have a work around using "Changedetector" then "Clipper" that will reinsert the removed objects.

 

 

Generalizer should maybe have an option "prevent shape removal" , as seen on mapshaper (http://www.mapshaper.org)

gio
Contributor
Forum|alt.badge.img+15
  • Contributor
  • Best Answer
  • April 16, 2014
Apart form filtering small sized polygons.

 

The various generalising schemes have options to control the amount of generalizing.

 

If u have it generalise to much, small objects will enter the range of generalisation and be removed altogether.

 

 

So its about tolerances, smoothingfactors, angels etc.. Experiment with these will help.

 

 

Gio

 


gio
Contributor
Forum|alt.badge.img+15
  • Contributor
  • April 16, 2014
well..not with angels of course..angles are more usefull here...:)

Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings