This post is closed to further activity.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
+60- Celebrity
- 3704 replies
In addition to what @pratap said, it would probably also be useful if we could take a look at your actual workspace and source data.
+60- Celebrity
- 3704 replies
This is example of data i work with
+60- Celebrity
- 3704 replies
Okay, the short answer is that you're getting 121 output features because the 86 features that you put in contain one or more aggregates and after splitting those aggregates into their component features you end up with a total of 121.
Were you expecting a different number?