I have a sorter, but I do not want it to sort if the first row in Field B has a value. I am guessing this will need a combination of transformers.
Solved
Is there a way to Sort by Field A but only if the first row in Field B is missing?
+2Best answer by takashi
Here is another way.
This post is closed to further activity.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
+2There are a few ways to do that. A solely FME way to do it is below. The tester output will be passed if it's not null and failed if it's null.
You could also use a python script or various other ways with different transformers.
+2There are a few ways to do that. A solely FME way to do it is below. The tester output will be passed if it's not null and failed if it's null.
You could also use a python script or various other ways with different transformers.
Thanks for sharing that. I was able to get it to work using a different method. I used a combination of testers, counters (local), and the statistics calculator. See attached image.
