Skip to main content
Solved

Anchored Snapper: Snapping Tolerance Parameter

  • January 18, 2018
  • 3 replies
  • 24 views

Forum|alt.badge.img+4

Hello,

I'm using the AnchoredSnapper transformer in workbench 2017.1

The Snapping Tolerance Parameter will differ based on a density variable that I've constructed.

I've created a User Parameter, (which is the only variable based option) and assigned it to the Snapping Tolerance Parameter but this does not give me the ability to pass the density variable at run-time.

Is there a way that I might accommodate this use case?

Thank you in advance,

Brek

Best answer by erik_jan

Do you have a large amount of different density values?

If not you can "split" the data in groups (AttributeFilter on the density attribute) and use multiple AnchoredSnapper transformers, each with a tolerance based on the density.

This post is closed to further activity.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.

3 replies

david_r
Celebrity
  • January 18, 2018

Would using a published parameter help?

Due to the way the AnchoredSnapper works, it's not possible to use a feature attribute for the snapping tolerance (basically it cannot vary from one feature to another).


erik_jan
Contributor
Forum|alt.badge.img+23
  • Contributor
  • Best Answer
  • January 18, 2018

Do you have a large amount of different density values?

If not you can "split" the data in groups (AttributeFilter on the density attribute) and use multiple AnchoredSnapper transformers, each with a tolerance based on the density.


Forum|alt.badge.img+4
  • Author
  • January 18, 2018

Do you have a large amount of different density values?

If not you can "split" the data in groups (AttributeFilter on the density attribute) and use multiple AnchoredSnapper transformers, each with a tolerance based on the density.

I would agree that this is a realistic option given the current constraint.

 

 

Tthank you for the feedback and have a good day!

 

 

Brek