Skipping Shape and FileGDB. And skipping databases. What is the best / most feature rich file format to open in ArcGIS ? GeoPackage? SQLITE?
+10I think it is hard to answer this question. Do you want to be able to open the data in ArcGIS Desktop/Pro or is it just about storing the data?
I could say Personal Geodatabase, but it is a database as well. And I don't think you can directly Read a EsriJSON file in Desktop or Pro. So what do you want to do with it?
+24- Contributor
lars_de_vries wrote:
I think it is hard to answer this question. Do you want to be able to open the data in ArcGIS Desktop/Pro or is it just about storing the data?
I could say Personal Geodatabase, but it is a database as well. And I don't think you can directly Read a EsriJSON file in Desktop or Pro. So what do you want to do with it?
To my knowledge ArcGIS does not distinguish between SQLITE or GeoPackage, they are just different schemas and ways of storing geometries in a SQLite-db and apparently cross-functional for some time.
desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/10.3/manage-data/databases/sqlite-and-arcgis.htm#
You're constraining yourself a lot here... I would probably go for GeoPackage, since it seems to have a promising future, which ESRI seems to want to be a part of:
http://www.esri.com/esri-news/releases/14-2qtr/esri-supports-ogc-geopackage-encoding-standard
+10A weird alternative, and maybe not to data-rich, could be DWG. But all is depending on the data you wish to store.
+24- Contributor
david_r wrote:
You're constraining yourself a lot here... I would probably go for GeoPackage, since it seems to have a promising future, which ESRI seems to want to be a part of:
http://www.esri.com/esri-news/releases/14-2qtr/esri-supports-ogc-geopackage-encoding-standard
+24- Contributor
lars_de_vries wrote:
A weird alternative, and maybe not to data-rich, could be DWG. But all is depending on the data you wish to store.
+24- Contributor
david_r wrote:
Oh, and if it's rasters you need: NetCDF is hard to beat in terms of features.
+10sigtill wrote:
Yep, thats an alternative - however its quite "old" and it might be issues with attributes.
And you didn't say it needed to be new... ;-)
sigtill wrote:
Thanks, It seems NetCDF 4 is not supported in FME. I`ll try to use the GeoPackage Raster to see how the performance is. I guess a regular JPEG-compressed GeoTIFF might also do the trick.
+24- Contributor
david_r wrote:
NetCDF 4 is actually supported starting with FME 2018.
+24- Contributor
lars_de_vries wrote:
If you van add blocks, preferably from a template, you have quite some possibilities.
And you didn't say it needed to be new... ;-)
Reply
Rich Text Editor, editor1
Editor toolbars
Press ALT 0 for help
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.