Archived
SurfaceDraper Output Port for Features that have not been Draped
+10In the SurfaceDraper I miss an output port for features that have not been draped. Now I will have to use additional transformers to determine which features have not been draped.
This post is closed to further activity.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
+10SurfaceDraper: Add a port for unchanged features.
+22- Safer
Hi @lars_de_vries, in our latest FME 2018.0 betas, we've added a rejection port to both the SurfaceDraper and SurfaceModeller transformers. This may help you in your quest to find features that were not draped.
+10- Contributor
I tried what happens to raster data in SurfaceDraper (2018.1) and it goes through as if it was handled but it is unchanged.
Documentation does not say anything about which datatypes are handled in SurfaceDraper.
Login to the community
No account yet? Create an account
An FME Account is required to contribute
LoginEnter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.