Skip to main content
Archived

Support for Common Database (CDB) format

  • October 13, 2016
  • 2 replies
  • 67 views
btl
Supporter
Forum|alt.badge.img+10

The Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC®) membership has announced OGC’s approval of the OGC Common DataBase (CDB) specification as an OGC Best Practice.

I wonder therefore if FME should offer support for the CDB format - while it is just has a folder based structure, it is unwieldy and difficult for a human to navigate; therefore a transformer to help extract and modify data from (or to) a CDB may be beneficial.

    This post is closed to further activity.
    It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
    Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
    For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
    If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.

    2 replies

    O
    • omrister
    • January 11, 2022

    I fully agree and looking forward to support this format

    V

    Yes! Safe please : go CDB!!!

    Community Stats

    32,734
    Posts
    124,168
    Replies
    41,231
    Members
    Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
    A product of
    Safe Software respectfully acknowledges that we live, learn and work on the traditional and unceded territories of the Kwantlen, Katzie, and Semiahmoo First Nations.