Skip to main content
Archived

Support for Common Database (CDB) format


btl
Contributor
  • Contributor

The Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC®) membership has announced OGC’s approval of the OGC Common DataBase (CDB) specification as an OGC Best Practice.

I wonder therefore if FME should offer support for the CDB format - while it is just has a folder based structure, it is unwieldy and difficult for a human to navigate; therefore a transformer to help extract and modify data from (or to) a CDB may be beneficial.

This post is closed to further activity.
It may be a question with a best answer, an implemented idea, or just a post needing no comment.
If you have a follow-up or related question, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.

2 replies

  • January 11, 2022

I fully agree and looking forward to support this format


Yes! Safe please : go CDB!!!


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings