Sometimes I just want to trace the follow of features through the Workspace when debugging. I have to define a Breakpoint somewhere after one of the Feature Types - and make an educated guess for the first one, or maybe I've disabled a Reader/Feature Type.
However it would be nice to be able to 'Run with Breakpoint' without one defined and popup a confirmation that says none found but would you like to use the first feature read to start the Breakpoint process. Clearly you couldn't 'Continue to next breakpoint' but could 'Step to next connection'. A very quick way of tracing a flow especially with multiple readers/feature types.
Archived
Run with Breakpoints without a Breakpoint Defined
+2This post is closed to further activity.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
+6- Participant
I think add a "Run and break here" to the context menu with arrow line is better.
Because it is not always need to watch every step.
+6- Participant
I mean not to add the breakpoint?Right click on any line directly,then select "Run and break here".
Login to the community
No account yet? Create an account
An FME Account is required to contribute
LoginEnter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.