FME is a great tool. Why a customer not interested in spatial data would have to pay for so many spatial formats and tools?
Could it be possible to have a specific light product cheaper for non spatial users?
Archived
FME License for Non spatial data
This post is closed to further activity.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
+22- Safer
Worth thinking about. However, based on the costs of traditional ETL tools, I'd have to say that non-spatial folks seem to be paying more than GIS folks! So I have to admit that I'm not sure that there's alot of room for price reduction. But I will admit that we could get rid of alot of "clutter" that provides no value for a tabular only person from a usability point of view. We will give it more thought.
+21- Safer
Updated idea statusGathering Interest→Archived
Idea merged into:All the votes from this idea have been transferred.
Login to the community
No account yet? Create an account
An FME Account is required to contribute
LoginEnter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.