I think it would be better that the user can omit inputting Update features if the update operations don't require them.
The JSONUpdater may also be so.
Archived
Allow omitting Update features for XMLUpdater optionally
The XMLUpdater has two input ports - Document and Update, and at least one Update feature is always required even if the update operations don't require any Update feature. For example, this simple Rename operation also requires a useless Update feature input.
I think it would be better that the user can omit inputting Update features if the update operations don't require them.
The JSONUpdater may also be so.
I think it would be better that the user can omit inputting Update features if the update operations don't require them.
The JSONUpdater may also be so.
This post is closed to further activity.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
+59- Safer
Already exists as PR#34202 - I'll add your info and a link to this suggestion page so the developers can see it has other support.