Hi @eugine_ta, thanks for your question.
From the files you've shared it does look like there's a noticeable difference between the AutoCAD and FME DEM outputs. We're doing a bit of investigation to try to find out if there is an explanation, workaround, or improvement that can be made. I'll let you know what we come up with.
Unfortunately the images you posted in your last comment are not appearing. Would you be able to try attaching them as files?
Thanks,
Nathan
Hi @eugine_ta, thanks for your question.
From the files you've shared it does look like there's a noticeable difference between the AutoCAD and FME DEM outputs. We're doing a bit of investigation to try to find out if there is an explanation, workaround, or improvement that can be made. I'll let you know what we come up with.
Unfortunately the images you posted in your last comment are not appearing. Would you be able to try attaching them as files?
Thanks,
Nathan
@NathanAtSafe ,thanks for notice this post!
Please find attached workbench that was build for processing.
Input data for this process.
Tiff results for FME and AutoCAD.
files at google drive
Also some analysis that we did, when compared 2 DEMs
diff-analysis.png
tin.png
fme.png
autocad.png
If there is some issues with input data please flag that up. So we could correct it. We are really interested on getting results soon.
@NathanAtSafe ,thanks for notice this post!
Please find attached workbench that was build for processing.
Input data for this process.
Tiff results for FME and AutoCAD.
files at google drive
Also some analysis that we did, when compared 2 DEMs
diff-analysis.png
tin.png
fme.png
autocad.png
If there is some issues with input data please flag that up. So we could correct it. We are really interested on getting results soon.
You're welcome @eugine_ta,
I've passed on the additional information to our dev team. I'll notify you here with any news.
Thanks for raising the issue!
Nathan