Previously for simplification purposes on reports, I would use the Total Count feature and define the attribute name as TOTAL for the number of objects with an id field. Now it dumps my counts to a field called id.total_count which I then have to run through an attributerenamer to change the attribute name to TOTAL which adds more transformation, clutters the workspace further, and uses more memory. Why was this function removed? Was it really such a big issue to be able to define the name of the output attribute?
This post is closed to further activity.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.

