Skip to main content
  • EN

I like using the automatic feature definition in the writer - attributes are defined automatically based on input.

 

Sometimes I wish I could influence the type and width (string length, field width) of the attribute within my workflow, to ensure the attribute is written out correctly. I know I can switch to manual feature definition and change it there but that makes things harder.

 

I've tried a number of transformers but I could not find any that would influence how the automatic setting interprets the attribute.

 

Does anyone know of a way to do this?

I think the SchemaScanner is currently the best way to do this. This will generate a Schema Feature, based on the attribute types in the data, which can be used in a FeatureWriter set to Dynamic Writing. See the article How to Use the SchemaScanner Transformer.

 

As an alternative you can try to create a new or modify a existing Schema Feature.

 

A third alternative, to set attribute types in workbench, is in development according to this idea.

@ekkischeffler​ SchemaScanner gives FME's interpretation of the data types. If you can, use FeatureReader <Schema> port - that returns the schema derived from the source data model, so might be more representative of what you want. Then ListSearcher to find where in the attribute{} list the attribute you want to influence. But both options mean you have shifted to a dynamic writer. The idea that @nielsgerrits​ refers to is under development.

Thanks @nielsgerrits​ and @Mark Stoakes​ - I already thought a dynamic writer would be required.

I'll keep it simple, using the automatic definition where possible and hopefully the Attribute Manager will see an update soon!

Reply


Community Stats

30,126
Posts
114,374
Replies
37,766
Members
Terms & ConditionsCookie settings
A product of
Safe Software respectfully acknowledges that we live, learn and work on the traditional and unceded territories of the Kwantlen, Katzie, and Semiahmoo First Nations.