I have a polygonal tax lot feature class where about half of the features are being rejected from the Point On Area Overlayer Transformer with a rejection code of "INVALID_POLYGON_GEOMETRY_VERTICES". How do I fix these so they are recognized by the transformer?
Solved
How do I fix polygon features so they aren't rejected from the Point On Area Overlayer Transformer?
+2- Contributor
Best answer by redgeographics
You can try running them through the GeometryValidator before the PointOnAreaOverlayer. Probably the OGC Compliant and OGC Simple tests would be good to try first and see what that does.
When you inspect those rejected features, do you notice anything odd about them?
This post is closed to further activity.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
+62- Celebrity
- Best Answer
You can try running them through the GeometryValidator before the PointOnAreaOverlayer. Probably the OGC Compliant and OGC Simple tests would be good to try first and see what that does.
When you inspect those rejected features, do you notice anything odd about them?
+2- Contributor
You can try running them through the GeometryValidator before the PointOnAreaOverlayer. Probably the OGC Compliant and OGC Simple tests would be good to try first and see what that does.
When you inspect those rejected features, do you notice anything odd about them?
Thanks for the suggestion @Hans van der Maarel. This seems to have worked! Interestingly all of the features passed the validator and no repairs were performed. I guess this transformer truly can just validate a geometry even if it doesn't repair anything? Thanks again.