FME is a great tool. Why a customer not interested in spatial data would have to pay for so many spatial formats and tools?
Could it be possible to have a specific light product cheaper for non spatial users?
This post is closed to further activity.
It may be a question with a best answer, an implemented idea, or just a post needing no comment.
If you have a follow-up or related question, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
It may be a question with a best answer, an implemented idea, or just a post needing no comment.
If you have a follow-up or related question, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
+19- Safer
Worth thinking about. However, based on the costs of traditional ETL tools, I'd have to say that non-spatial folks seem to be paying more than GIS folks! So I have to admit that I'm not sure that there's alot of room for price reduction. But I will admit that we could get rid of alot of "clutter" that provides no value for a tabular only person from a usability point of view. We will give it more thought.
+15- Safer
Updated idea statusGathering Interest→Archived
Idea merged into:
All the votes from this idea have been transferred.
Helpful Members This Week
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.