Skip to main content
Solved

GeometryExtractor with GML 3.2.1 Variant

  • November 22, 2013
  • 1 reply
  • 14 views
mhab
Contributor
Forum|alt.badge.img+10
Hello

 

 

In order to get a GML formatted string, which I need for later XML/GML writing, I use the GeometryExtractor transformer with variant GML v3.2.1.

 

 

So far so good.

 

 

My problem is that it in many cases it creates Geometry of type <gml:LineString ...> and for reasons I cannot influence (German NAS Standard ;-()

 

in many cases I need to get geometry of type <gml:CompositeCurve ...> otherwise it will NOT validate ....

 

 

In GeometryExtractor I don't see an option which allows me to control this.

 

 

Any ideas out there how to solve this problem ?

 

 

Thanks

 

Michael

Best answer by davideagle

A horrible short term workaround but perhaps test for composite curves with some other identifier and then use the StringReplacer on the geometry string. Not ideal but buys you time to raise a PR with Safe.
This post is closed to further activity.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.

1 reply

davideagle
Contributor
Forum|alt.badge.img+22
  • davideagleContributor
  • Contributor
  • Best Answer
  • November 23, 2013
A horrible short term workaround but perhaps test for composite curves with some other identifier and then use the StringReplacer on the geometry string. Not ideal but buys you time to raise a PR with Safe.

Community Stats

32,154
Posts
122,043
Replies
39,812
Members

Latest FME

Terms & ConditionsCookie settingsAccessibility statement
A product of
Safe Software respectfully acknowledges that we live, learn and work on the traditional and unceded territories of the Kwantlen, Katzie, and Semiahmoo First Nations.