Skip to main content
Question

ECW writer compression

  • March 5, 2020
  • 1 reply
  • 100 views

nicholas
Contributor
Forum|alt.badge.img+13

I am transitioning from using ERDAS Imagine to FME to generate ECW files

I need to understand the difference between the terminology used by both systems with regards to compression.

FME ECW writer refers to "Compress by Percentage (0-99)" with a default of 75

this means that the output image will be 75% compressed, or one-quarter the size

ERDAS Imagine refers to "Target ECW Compression" with a default of 20

this means that the output image will be compressed by a ratio of 20:1, or one-twentieth the size.

Two questions;

1) Why does FME use a compression percentage and not a compression ratio (the convention established by ERDAS)

2) Why is FME's default compression different to ERDAS's default compression?

1 reply

jovitaatsafe
Safer
Forum|alt.badge.img+11

Hi @nicholas,

We use compression percentage due to the programming libraries that we're using for ECW, in particular this parameter phrasing comes from GDAL. I suspect that the differences in default compression would also be attributed to the different libraries that we're using to the ones that ERDAS uses.

It might be worth posting a new Idea here if you wish to see changes in the compression method from the user side of things so that it's a more consistent experience when working with raster compression.


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings