I want to execute a workspace in FME Server by an email that is Bcc'd to FME Server. However, I am worried that a Reply All from both internally or externally may trigger the workspace to be executed again. Any thoughts or suggestions on best practices to prevent this from occurring? Thank you in advance.
This post is closed to further activity.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
- 8394 replies
Are you sure this will be a problem? If FME Server is Bcc'd, then that email address won't be visible to the other receivers, and thus not included in any replies, forwards, etc.
+1Are you sure this will be a problem? If FME Server is Bcc'd, then that email address won't be visible to the other receivers, and thus not included in any replies, forwards, etc.
+1Are you sure this will be a problem? If FME Server is Bcc'd, then that email address won't be visible to the other receivers, and thus not included in any replies, forwards, etc.
- 8394 replies
I do not believe it used to be that way (don't know how far back Bcc's were still included) this was the concern of my management. However, you are right. As of now, by default (at least in Outlook as tested) Bcc'd recipients are not included on replies, reply all, forwards, etc.