+1Hi,
I would like to transpose data into a new table. My input table is:
CODE VALUE_1 VALUE_2
C1 11 22
C2 33 44
C3 55 66
My output table should be:
C1-VALUES_1 C1-VALUES_2 C2-VALUES_1 C2-VALUES_2 C3-VALUES_1 C3-VALUES_2
11 22 33 44 55 66
This is what I have done so far.
Please see attached my workspace. Thanks,
Jeffrey
Cc: @takashi
Best answer by ebygomm
I'd use this sort of workflow - where you create new attributes based on the attribute values, expose them and then aggregate
+44I'd use this sort of workflow - where you create new attributes based on the attribute values, expose them and then aggregate
I'd use this sort of workflow - where you create new attributes based on the attribute values, expose them and then aggregate
Basically the same approach, but I prefer to use the BulkAttributeRenamer.
+1@egomm & @takashi: Since the CODE is a dynamic list, what's the best way to avoid the hard code step in the AtrtibuteExposer transformer? Thanks.
+44@egomm & @takashi: Since the CODE is a dynamic list, what's the best way to avoid the hard code step in the AtrtibuteExposer transformer? Thanks.
What is your final destination for the data? It's not possible to avoid the attributeexposer if you need the attributes available in the workspace, but it is possibly to write them to a destination format without knowing them in advance.
+1@egomm & @takashi: Since the CODE is a dynamic list, what's the best way to avoid the hard code step in the AtrtibuteExposer transformer? Thanks.
I plan to save the output data in Excel for now.
