We currently use the ArcGIS Data Interoperability extension for standardization and validation of alphanumeric and spatial data, processing datasets ranging from 1,000 to 10,000,000 records.
We are aware that there is a difference in the number of transformers available compared to FME Form, but we would like to understand whether there are deeper technical differences that a beginner user should consider when deciding between continuing with ArcGIS Data Interoperability or investing in a full FME Form license.
Specifically, we would like to know:
1. Performance with large data volumes
Are there significant performance differences between the two solutions, especially when working with millions of records?
2. Structural limitations of ArcGIS Data Interoperability
We would like to understand whether there are important limitations regarding:
-
automation and scheduling of routines,
-
database integration,
-
advanced geometry manipulation,
-
building and debugging more robust workflows.
3. Engine, parallelization, and scalability
Does ArcGIS Data Interoperability impose any significant restrictions compared to FME Form in terms of:
-
Engine performance,
-
multi-threading,
-
parallel processing,
-
scalability for intensive spatial ETL operations.
4. Advanced tools and extensibility
Are there limitations regarding the creation or use of:
-
Custom Transformers,
-
PythonCaller,
-
detailed logs,
-
debugging tools,
-
operational monitoring.
5. Costs, licensing, and maintenance (additional point)
What is the annual renewal cost for FME Form support? Is it similar to the initial purchase price of the perpetual license, or is it significantly lower?




