I am trying to reproject this feature in order to view it on bing MAP, but its not working,
those features should be located In Dammam City in Saudi Arabia
This post is closed to further activity.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
Apparently the original data claims to be in UTM84-39N, which is in fact the correct UTM zone for Dammam.
Even when I specify this in the Reprojector (and the CSMapReprojector for that matter) and set the destination to EPSG:3857 instead of the deprecated EPSG:900913 the data ends up near the Maldives.
The most logical explanation is that the coordinates are not in the system that they claim to be or that there's a unit error.
If you know what the correct coordinates for features in Dammam in UTM84-39N are you can check the original data in the Data Inspector (don't set a background map) and see what the difference is. If it appears to be a factor of 10 (or 100 or 1000) off it's most likely different metric units being used. If it's something else then you'll have to know which other units can potentially be used in Saudi Arabia.
The X and Y coordinates seem to swapped in your data. Please use a CoordinateSwapper transformer with Swap Type set to 'X <-> Y' to restore the correct coordinate order.
This coordinate swapping can happen if the data is originally imported from GML, or created from a surveyor's CSV file (they tend to put latitude first).
The X and Y coordinates seem to swapped in your data. Please use a CoordinateSwapper transformer with Swap Type set to 'X <-> Y' to restore the correct coordinate order.
This coordinate swapping can happen if the data is originally imported from GML, or created from a surveyor's CSV file (they tend to put latitude first).
it did work for the shapefile
the same data is exposed and WFS and have the same issue but when we use the swapper it didn't work, is there any reason why ?