An old version of the Dissolver (Version 3) has a parameter called overlapping input which can be set to Overlap or No Overlap
Can anyone recall what the difference is?
Solved
Overlapping Input parameter in old version of Dissolver
+44- Influencer
- 3427 replies
Best answer by david_r
Wow, that's an old version. Even FME 2014 has the Dissolver at version 11.
Found this nugget, hope it helps:
Source: https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/extensions/data-interoperability/pdf/FMETransformers.pdf
This post is closed to further activity.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
- 8392 replies
- Best Answer
Wow, that's an old version. Even FME 2014 has the Dissolver at version 11.
Found this nugget, hope it helps:
Source: https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/extensions/data-interoperability/pdf/FMETransformers.pdf
+44- Influencer
- 3427 replies
Wow, that's an old version. Even FME 2014 has the Dissolver at version 11.
Found this nugget, hope it helps:
Source: https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/extensions/data-interoperability/pdf/FMETransformers.pdf
Thanks, i think that confirms for me that if Overlap was set then the current dissolver should do the same thing (but better!) and I'll hope I don't find one using the No Overlap function
- 8392 replies
Thanks, i think that confirms for me that if Overlap was set then the current dissolver should do the same thing (but better!) and I'll hope I don't find one using the No Overlap function
Agree, I understand it the same way as you. If, for some reason, you find one using the No Overlap option, you could perhaps to do some magic with e.g. the SpatialRelator first.