I need to perform AffineWarper in Group By mode. Separate affine control vectors for separate group of objects. Any idea?
Solved
How to perform AffineWarper in Group By mode?
+1- Contributor
- 19 replies
Best answer by takashi
A possible way is to wrap the AffineWarper by a custom transformer and publish the "Parallel Process By" parameter as a transformer parameter. It's not exactly equal to the regular "Group By", but it works like that. Try the steps illustrated in this image.
This post is closed to further activity.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
- 7843 replies
- Best Answer
A possible way is to wrap the AffineWarper by a custom transformer and publish the "Parallel Process By" parameter as a transformer parameter. It's not exactly equal to the regular "Group By", but it works like that. Try the steps illustrated in this image.
+2- Contributor
- 9 replies
After banging my head trying to figure out why this wasn't working, and using feature caching to do my debugging... I saw this handy post, https://knowledge.safe.com/questions/78585/how-to-add-group-by-to-any-transformer.html
With this IMPORTANT note:
One caveat I’ve noticed about this hack:- Make sure to turn off Feature Caching, otherwise the Group by won’t have any effect.
+18- Supporter
- 1442 replies
A possible way is to wrap the AffineWarper by a custom transformer and publish the "Parallel Process By" parameter as a transformer parameter. It's not exactly equal to the regular "Group By", but it works like that. Try the steps illustrated in this image.
Good old wrap it in a custom transformer en voila! group by is possible!
+11- Safer
- 324 replies
After banging my head trying to figure out why this wasn't working, and using feature caching to do my debugging... I saw this handy post, https://knowledge.safe.com/questions/78585/how-to-add-group-by-to-any-transformer.html
With this IMPORTANT note:
One caveat I’ve noticed about this hack:- Make sure to turn off Feature Caching, otherwise the Group by won’t have any effect.
@lanthar Glad you found that note helpful. Good news: We've fixed that bug in the latest 2019.0. You can test it out in the current beta. Available here: https://www.safe.com/support/support-resources/fme-downloads/beta/