Skip to main content
Solved

convert rd coordinates to Bing map coordinates

  • April 6, 2019
  • 7 replies
  • 26 views

Forum|alt.badge.img

Hallo everybody,

 

Thanks to fme user @erik_jan i made my first FME model converter for rd coordinates.

I use AttributeReprojector too do the job but i dont know what coordinate system i have too use.

my source coordinate system is Netherland-RDOld- 2008. that seems right because it gave me the same x,y (111114, 566230) coordinate as the original file.

 

I want too convert it too 53.08111, 4.73228 coordinates but i dont know what destination coordinate systeem i have too use. I try different things but didnt get the desire result.

 

My attempts to google it, search on this forum was without results. So i hope i can put the question here so somebody can help me with it.

Greetings,

Charaf

 

 

Best answer by ebygomm

Try LL-WGS84 / ESPG:4326

This post is closed to further activity.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.

7 replies

ebygomm
Influencer
Forum|alt.badge.img+44
  • Influencer
  • 3427 replies
  • Best Answer
  • April 7, 2019

Try LL-WGS84 / ESPG:4326


Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Author
  • 5 replies
  • April 7, 2019

Try LL-WGS84 / ESPG:4326

Thank you for your help, but it didn't give me the right location.

If i set the destination coordinate to LL-wgs84/ESPG:4326 I get the following result for the Lat: 52.85655 and long 13.80720 which is in Germany. This is not the desire outcome.

the result must be 53.08111, 4.73228 in the Netherlands. I use a website where i can convert the coordinate for each row. this is the link to convert the website. https://www.gpscoordinaten.nl/converteer-gps-coordinaten.php

somehow the website convert it good, but i can do only 1 coordinate each time.

Never the less thank you for your effort @egomm

 

Greetings,

Charaf


ebygomm
Influencer
Forum|alt.badge.img+44
  • Influencer
  • 3427 replies
  • April 7, 2019

Something a bit odd going on, when i tested i'd created a point at 111114, 566230 and reprojected the point rather than the attributes which gave a result that looks correct. The attribute reprojector gives a different result, as you've reported.

 


Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Author
  • 5 replies
  • April 7, 2019

Something a bit odd going on, when i tested i'd created a point at 111114, 566230 and reprojected the point rather than the attributes which gave a result that looks correct. The attribute reprojector gives a different result, as you've reported.

 

i dont fully understand. What are you suggesting that i should make a point first before reprojecting?


ebygomm
Influencer
Forum|alt.badge.img+44
  • Influencer
  • 3427 replies
  • April 7, 2019

i dont fully understand. What are you suggesting that i should make a point first before reprojecting?

Yes, make the point first then reproject. Extract the coordinates after reprojecting if you need as attributes. In theory it shouldn't make a difference. But it looks to me like the attribute reprojector is perhaps not working as it should.

 

Bing maps definitely uses WGS84


ebygomm
Influencer
Forum|alt.badge.img+44
  • Influencer
  • 3427 replies
  • April 7, 2019

i dont fully understand. What are you suggesting that i should make a point first before reprojecting?

Apologies, i'd selected Netherlands-RDNew-2008 for one of them which is why i was getting different results. Are you sure you have the correct coordinate system for your origin @cbouichi ? Because reprojecting from RDNew to WSG84 gives the coordinates you report


Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Author
  • 5 replies
  • April 7, 2019

Something a bit odd going on, when i tested i'd created a point at 111114, 566230 and reprojected the point rather than the attributes which gave a result that looks correct. The attribute reprojector gives a different result, as you've reported.

 

@egomm you made my day.

I got the results where i was looking for.

 

Thanks alot,

Greetings from the Netherlands.