Merging different geometries into a single SHP

Can you provide more information on ‘examine the SHP in the FGDB’? These are two different file formats. Generally shapefiles only support a single geometry per shapefile, so I’m a little confused on how you aren’t getting warnings from FME Form/Desktop.

Are you tied specifically to a shapefile output? A file geodatabase output would allow you to write multiple geometries to a single geodatabase.

This is not possible. These formats (shapefile / file geodatabase) only support a single geometrytype. Points, lines or polygons.

You could also look at writing to three separate shapefiles, one for each geom type

Got it! @dustin  Right now, I have two sets of scripts running. One that converts features from the DWG into SHP, then another script that takes that output of a SHP from the first script I posted about and imports it into a FGDB.

So the end goal is still a FC in a FGDB that would update whenever the features in the source DWG are updated.

I am not tied to a SHP if this isn’t necessary, as this was the only workaround that I could find that would enable me to run a script with the geometries combined (i.e. polyline, arc, area) into a single SHP then import it into an FC.

@boomer87 There’s no reason you couldn’t convert directly from DWG to FGDB with a single script/FME workspace. Whether you are going to shapefile or file geodatabase, you still have the same limitations with geometry storage. It’s just that the file geodatabase is arguably easier to manage due to it being a single database storing a feature class for each geometry, opposed to multiple shapefiles for each geometry.

The attached video might be beneficial. It’s dealing with DGN, but the same concepts.

Thank you @nielsgerrits, @hkingsbury and @dustin for clarifying the limitations with mixed geometries.

@dustin, this video is very useful - thanks for this. It makes note of the fact that features within dwg/dgns are able to exist despite having different geometries, whereas the same is not the case with SHP/FGDB as you indicated.

If that’s the case, I’ll separate the different geometries into different feature classes and group them into individual groups within a map service based on specific layers. Have a great week everyone, thanks again!