Skip to main content
Released

Matcher - lenient but not too lenient

Related products:FME Form
siennaatsafe
redgeographics
lars_de_vries
jasperwis
cwarren
+3
  • siennaatsafe
    siennaatsafe
  • redgeographics
    redgeographics
  • lars_de_vries
    lars_de_vries
  • jasperwis
    jasperwis
  • cwarren
    cwarren
  • jpvo
    jpvo
  • jobrien
  • christophe.b

ebygomm
Influencer

It would be great if it was possible for the matcher to consider line direction but allow use of an interior vertex tolerance and an extra vertex tolerance.

IDGeometry
1LINESTRING (0 0,50.05 0,100 0)
2LINESTRING (0 0,100 0)
3LINESTRING (100 0,0 0)


So for the above lines, I'd want it to consider 1 & 2 a match if i was using a tolerance of 0.1

This post is closed to further activity.
It may be a question with a best answer, an implemented idea, or just a post needing no comment.
If you have a follow-up or related question, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.

2 replies

fmelizard
Contributor
Forum|alt.badge.img+17
  • Contributor
  • December 6, 2018

The Matcher had a complete overhaul for FME 2019 and tolerance was a key part of that. Anyone want to see if the 2019 betas do what is desired? http://www.safe.com/beta


ebygomm
Influencer
Forum|alt.badge.img+31
  • Author
  • Influencer
  • December 6, 2018

So it appears that the vertex tolerance in the new matcher is implemented even with lenient geometry matching set to no from my simple experiment. Happy days


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings