Skip to main content
Solved

Do junctions add to cache

  • January 4, 2022
  • 2 replies
  • 11 views

So I was given a workbench that was quite extensive and it has a lot of junctions. These junctions were only added so that annotations could be placed on a specific location for readability. This doesn't sit well with me because feature caching is on and the workbench is prone to memory issues already. Also, I don't like the cluttering. But it makes sense to get the annotations where you want. However, after reading several posts it is still not clear to me whether junctions add to the cache or not. Can somebody tell me whether they do add to the cache or not?

Best answer by mark2atsafe

The alternative to junctions is to double-click on the connection lines to add extra vertices. You can control label position like that.

 

image 

Basically, add two extra vertices and wherever you move them, the label will be in the middle of them.

This post is closed to further activity.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.

2 replies

Forum|alt.badge.img+2
  • 1891 replies
  • January 4, 2022

@geotics​ Yes: Data passing through Junctions is cached when feature caching is on. That will increase the volume of data written to disc, but should not impact memory usage.


mark2atsafe
Safer
Forum|alt.badge.img+56
  • Safer
  • 2554 replies
  • Best Answer
  • January 7, 2022

The alternative to junctions is to double-click on the connection lines to add extra vertices. You can control label position like that.

 

image 

Basically, add two extra vertices and wherever you move them, the label will be in the middle of them.