So I was given a workbench that was quite extensive and it has a lot of junctions. These junctions were only added so that annotations could be placed on a specific location for readability. This doesn't sit well with me because feature caching is on and the workbench is prone to memory issues already. Also, I don't like the cluttering. But it makes sense to get the annotations where you want. However, after reading several posts it is still not clear to me whether junctions add to the cache or not. Can somebody tell me whether they do add to the cache or not?
Solved
Do junctions add to cache
Best answer by mark2atsafe
The alternative to junctions is to double-click on the connection lines to add extra vertices. You can control label position like that.
Basically, add two extra vertices and wherever you move them, the label will be in the middle of them.
@geotics Yes: Data passing through Junctions is cached when feature caching is on. That will increase the volume of data written to disc, but should not impact memory usage.
+46- Safer
- Best Answer
The alternative to junctions is to double-click on the connection lines to add extra vertices. You can control label position like that.
Basically, add two extra vertices and wherever you move them, the label will be in the middle of them.
Reply
Rich Text Editor, editor1
Editor toolbars
Press ALT 0 for help
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.