You could do that by using a SurfaceModeller. Feed the bathymetry and soundings in there (assuming these are respectively 3d lines and points) and then take the DEM points output (setting the DEM spacing to an appropriate size) and feed those into a LAS writer.
You could do that by using a SurfaceModeller. Feed the bathymetry and soundings in there (assuming these are respectively 3d lines and points) and then take the DEM points output (setting the DEM spacing to an appropriate size) and feed those into a LAS writer.
Thanks for your reply! Unfortunately I still have no idea what to do with this. I will read up on the SurfaceModeller transformer but if you have time to explain this further, that would be great!
Thanks for your reply! Unfortunately I still have no idea what to do with this. I will read up on the SurfaceModeller transformer but if you have time to explain this further, that would be great!
The Surface Tolerance is a filtering value. If you set it to 0 all input features will be considered for generating the surface, any positive value will filter out features. From the docs:
When a positive value for surface tolerance is specified, it works as follows. For each vertex that is being added to the model:
- If the x,y location is outside the 2D convex hull of the existing surface model, it is added to the model.
- If the x,y location is inside the 2D convex hull of the existing surface model:
- The difference between the z value from the existing surface model and the z value of the vertex is calculated.
- This difference is compared to the surface model tolerance.
- The vertex is only added to the surface model if the difference is greater than the surface tolerance; otherwise, the vertex is discarded.
The other parameter that's important to you right now is the output DEM spacing, X and Y. That will determine the point density of the DEM you're eventually going to write to the LAS. Lower values = higher density (not necessarily accuracy)
You'll have to experiment with these values a bit and see what output works best for you. Keep in mind it's interpolating from your source data so what I would try first is set the surface tolerance to 0 and the DEM spacing to a value that's similar to the (average) spacing of your soundings.
The Surface Tolerance is a filtering value. If you set it to 0 all input features will be considered for generating the surface, any positive value will filter out features. From the docs:
When a positive value for surface tolerance is specified, it works as follows. For each vertex that is being added to the model:
- If the x,y location is outside the 2D convex hull of the existing surface model, it is added to the model.
- If the x,y location is inside the 2D convex hull of the existing surface model:
- The difference between the z value from the existing surface model and the z value of the vertex is calculated.
- This difference is compared to the surface model tolerance.
- The vertex is only added to the surface model if the difference is greater than the surface tolerance; otherwise, the vertex is discarded.
The other parameter that's important to you right now is the output DEM spacing, X and Y. That will determine the point density of the DEM you're eventually going to write to the LAS. Lower values = higher density (not necessarily accuracy)
You'll have to experiment with these values a bit and see what output works best for you. Keep in mind it's interpolating from your source data so what I would try first is set the surface tolerance to 0 and the DEM spacing to a value that's similar to the (average) spacing of your soundings.
Also, inspect your source data! The bathymetry should be 3d lines and the soundings should be 3d points. Use a 3DForcer if they're not.
