Skip to main content
Question

Reading WFS: Internal geometry building errors


Forum|alt.badge.img

We try to read data from a WFS (see attached FME workspace) and get the following error messages:

xfMap registered 168 messages of type: 'xml-multi-area' Geometry Builder: No geometry was created in the 'xml-multi-area' builder

xfMap registered 168 messages of type: Error constructing geometry for feature, the feature will be tagged with the xml_geom_error boolean attribute

    What is the reason why the FME-internal 'xml-multi-area' Geometry Builder doesn't create area geometries in some cases (here: 168 out of 2000) even though all the read geometries from the WFS pass all checks of the GeometryValidator (except one case with self-intersection).

    Thank you very much in advance for your help.

    2 replies

    debbiatsafe
    Safer
    Forum|alt.badge.img+20
    • Safer
    • January 11, 2018

    Hi @pramisters

    I believe FME creates geometries for all passed features. When you run the workspace, you will see 1999 features going to the passed port of the GeometryValidator and 1 feature going to the failed port. In addition, if you attach an Inspector to the passed port, you would see 1999 features within Data Inspector. I would guess that 168 messages refer to elements of the single failed feature (possibly vertices?) and not 168 features out of 2000.

    Kind regards,

    Debbi


    Forum|alt.badge.img
    • Author
    • January 16, 2018
    debbiatsafe wrote:

    Hi @pramisters

    I believe FME creates geometries for all passed features. When you run the workspace, you will see 1999 features going to the passed port of the GeometryValidator and 1 feature going to the failed port. In addition, if you attach an Inspector to the passed port, you would see 1999 features within Data Inspector. I would guess that 168 messages refer to elements of the single failed feature (possibly vertices?) and not 168 features out of 2000.

    Kind regards,

    Debbi

    Hi @DebbiAtSafe

     

     

    Thanks for your feeback!

     

    I found out that for the ?168 features the WFS doesn't supply a geometry. So FME is right when it says that it can't create a geometry for these features.

     

    Somehow misleading is the fact that these features pass the GeometryValidator although they have no geometry.

     

    Best regards,

     

     

    pramisters

     

     

     


    Cookie policy

    We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

     
    Cookie settings