Skip to main content
Solved

Selection sequence via published parameters


toth17

Hello, I have in front a reader SpatiaLite composed of different layers (hydrographic basins, communal limits, regional limits ... "). I want to propose to the end user a list of extraction options (list of watersheds, list of municipalities, list of regions ...) according to a type of previously selected right-of-way ("watersheds", " regions ", ...).

I arrive with a published parameter applied on a transform tester to select the type of footprint stored in the format attribute "fme_feature_type" and store it in a new field "Emprise" with the "conditional attribute values" in an AttributeManager.

But I do not succeed after to chain a selection on the selection via a second published parameter. The selection of the right of way is not filtered according to the first choice. Thank you in advance for all your advice.

Best answer by jdh

Unfortunately that is not currently possible.

If you would like to see it implemented please vote on the following idea:

https://knowledge.safe.com/content/idea/23140/ability-to-set-parameter-relationships.html

 

View original
Did this help you find an answer to your question?

3 replies

jdh
Contributor
Forum|alt.badge.img+28
  • Contributor
  • Best Answer
  • December 21, 2018

Unfortunately that is not currently possible.

If you would like to see it implemented please vote on the following idea:

https://knowledge.safe.com/content/idea/23140/ability-to-set-parameter-relationships.html

 


danilo_fme
Evangelist
Forum|alt.badge.img+41
  • Evangelist
  • December 23, 2018
jdh wrote:

Unfortunately that is not currently possible.

If you would like to see it implemented please vote on the following idea:

https://knowledge.safe.com/content/idea/23140/ability-to-set-parameter-relationships.html

 

Nice. i voted now this Idea.


toth17
  • Author
  • December 24, 2018
jdh wrote:

Unfortunately that is not currently possible.

If you would like to see it implemented please vote on the following idea:

https://knowledge.safe.com/content/idea/23140/ability-to-set-parameter-relationships.html

 

Thank you for answering my question and a pity that it is not possible at present even if it did not seem insurmountable as a procedure. I will vote for the idea. Thanks again


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings