Skip to main content
Solved

Any other tested FME2022 (FME(R) 2022.0.0.0 (20220428 - Build 22337 - WIN64) and experience slow Esri Filegeodatabase Reader is slower than "used to be"

palhermans
Contributor
Forum|alt.badge.img+10

A very simple workspace using ArcObjects Esri FileGeodatabaseReader and output to an Inspector. Duration 16.5 seconds with FME2022 and similar workspace duration is 10.5 seconds with FME2021.2

 

Logfiles attached and a Excel spreadsheet with output from FME_PROFILE_RESULT_CSV

 

best

Pål Herman

Best answer by kailinatsafe

palhermans wrote:

Hi @kailinatsafe​  and thanks for reaching out. I am not allowed to share the data public but have simulated something similar with a workspace:

  • 20000 points "randomly" generated within a X and Y range - written as points to the filegeodatabase
  • Buffered these points "randomly" with buffers in range 5 to 50 meters , replaced with a 2D box which is rotated "randomly" within -45-45 deg and written as polygons to the geodatabase
  • chopped the boxes to max 2 vertices and written results as lines

All to simulate building centerpoints, outlines and polygons. With these data FME2022 is about 30% slower (using the GUI). With the actual data we are at approx 40%.

Best Pål Herman (zipped geodatabase attached)

 

 

Hello @Pål Herman Sund​ , thanks for sharing your data. I was able to reproduce the delay you're describing between 2021 and 2022.0. There are a few things that appear in the 2022.0 logfile, that are not logged in 2021 - so it seems like something has slightly changed here. This has been filed as FMEENGINE-73370. I've added a note to have this thread updated once resolved as well. Best, Kailin.

View original
3 Attachments
pH
Did this help you find an answer to your question?

5 replies

palhermans
Contributor
Forum|alt.badge.img+10
  • palhermansContributor
  • Author
  • Contributor
  • May 9, 2022

..workspaces are both made in their respective FME versions - so no issues with not updated readers

pH
kailinatsafe
Safer
Forum|alt.badge.img+21
palhermans wrote:

..workspaces are both made in their respective FME versions - so no issues with not updated readers

Hello @Pål Herman Sund​ , would you be able to share a copy of your FGDB? If you're unable to share it on the FME Community, please submit a support case with us so we can take a closer look! Best, Kailin.

palhermans
Contributor
Forum|alt.badge.img+10
  • palhermansContributor
  • Author
  • Contributor
  • May 10, 2022

Hi @kailinatsafe​  and thanks for reaching out. I am not allowed to share the data public but have simulated something similar with a workspace:

  • 20000 points "randomly" generated within a X and Y range - written as points to the filegeodatabase
  • Buffered these points "randomly" with buffers in range 5 to 50 meters , replaced with a 2D box which is rotated "randomly" within -45-45 deg and written as polygons to the geodatabase
  • chopped the boxes to max 2 vertices and written results as lines

All to simulate building centerpoints, outlines and polygons. With these data FME2022 is about 30% slower (using the GUI). With the actual data we are at approx 40%.

Best Pål Herman (zipped geodatabase attached)

 

 

1 Attachments
pH
kailinatsafe
Safer
Forum|alt.badge.img+21
  • kailinatsafeSafer
  • Safer
  • Best Answer
  • May 10, 2022
palhermans wrote:

Hi @kailinatsafe​  and thanks for reaching out. I am not allowed to share the data public but have simulated something similar with a workspace:

  • 20000 points "randomly" generated within a X and Y range - written as points to the filegeodatabase
  • Buffered these points "randomly" with buffers in range 5 to 50 meters , replaced with a 2D box which is rotated "randomly" within -45-45 deg and written as polygons to the geodatabase
  • chopped the boxes to max 2 vertices and written results as lines

All to simulate building centerpoints, outlines and polygons. With these data FME2022 is about 30% slower (using the GUI). With the actual data we are at approx 40%.

Best Pål Herman (zipped geodatabase attached)

 

 

Hello @Pål Herman Sund​ , thanks for sharing your data. I was able to reproduce the delay you're describing between 2021 and 2022.0. There are a few things that appear in the 2022.0 logfile, that are not logged in 2021 - so it seems like something has slightly changed here. This has been filed as FMEENGINE-73370. I've added a note to have this thread updated once resolved as well. Best, Kailin.

palhermans
Contributor
Forum|alt.badge.img+10
  • palhermansContributor
  • Author
  • Contributor
  • May 11, 2022
kailinatsafe wrote:

Hello @Pål Herman Sund​ , thanks for sharing your data. I was able to reproduce the delay you're describing between 2021 and 2022.0. There are a few things that appear in the 2022.0 logfile, that are not logged in 2021 - so it seems like something has slightly changed here. This has been filed as FMEENGINE-73370. I've added a note to have this thread updated once resolved as well. Best, Kailin.

Thanks @kailinatsafe​

pH

pH

Reply


Helpful Members This Week

Community Stats

31,191
Posts
118,235
Replies
38,799
Members

Latest FME

Terms & ConditionsCookie settings

Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings
A product of
Safe Software respectfully acknowledges that we live, learn and work on the traditional and unceded territories of the Kwantlen, Katzie, and Semiahmoo First Nations.