Skip to main content
Solved

Selection sequence via published parameters

  • December 21, 2018
  • 3 replies
  • 21 views

toth17

Hello, I have in front a reader SpatiaLite composed of different layers (hydrographic basins, communal limits, regional limits ... "). I want to propose to the end user a list of extraction options (list of watersheds, list of municipalities, list of regions ...) according to a type of previously selected right-of-way ("watersheds", " regions ", ...).

I arrive with a published parameter applied on a transform tester to select the type of footprint stored in the format attribute "fme_feature_type" and store it in a new field "Emprise" with the "conditional attribute values" in an AttributeManager.

But I do not succeed after to chain a selection on the selection via a second published parameter. The selection of the right of way is not filtered according to the first choice. Thank you in advance for all your advice.

Best answer by jdh

Unfortunately that is not currently possible.

If you would like to see it implemented please vote on the following idea:

https://knowledge.safe.com/content/idea/23140/ability-to-set-parameter-relationships.html

 

This post is closed to further activity.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.

3 replies

jdh
Contributor
Forum|alt.badge.img+36
  • Contributor
  • 2001 replies
  • Best Answer
  • December 21, 2018

Unfortunately that is not currently possible.

If you would like to see it implemented please vote on the following idea:

https://knowledge.safe.com/content/idea/23140/ability-to-set-parameter-relationships.html

 


danilo_fme
Celebrity
Forum|alt.badge.img+51
  • Celebrity
  • 2076 replies
  • December 23, 2018

Unfortunately that is not currently possible.

If you would like to see it implemented please vote on the following idea:

https://knowledge.safe.com/content/idea/23140/ability-to-set-parameter-relationships.html

 

Nice. i voted now this Idea.


toth17
  • Author
  • 1 reply
  • December 24, 2018

Unfortunately that is not currently possible.

If you would like to see it implemented please vote on the following idea:

https://knowledge.safe.com/content/idea/23140/ability-to-set-parameter-relationships.html

 

Thank you for answering my question and a pity that it is not possible at present even if it did not seem insurmountable as a procedure. I will vote for the idea. Thanks again