I find my self doing this manual process a bunch where I like to have output ports on the TestFilter named by cached values of a particular attribute and a simple test condition on that attribute. This helps visually understand and present workflows. for example if we are doing feature routing based on an attribute value. It would be very nice to have a tool in the TestFilter that auto populates output port based on an attribute value and at the same time add a test condition for that attribute to each main row of the TestFilter. This kind of relates to another idea to have the TestFilter save the value of an output port to an new attribute.
This post is closed to further activity.
It may be a question with a best answer, an implemented idea, or just a post needing no comment.
If you have a follow-up or related question, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
It may be a question with a best answer, an implemented idea, or just a post needing no comment.
If you have a follow-up or related question, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
+15- Safer
Updated idea statusGathering Interest→Archived
Idea merged into:
All the votes from this idea have been transferred.
Helpful Members This Week
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.