Skip to main content
Gathering Interest

Option to have Test TestFilter Port Name Output as an Attribute

Related products:Transformers
romersl
siennaatsafe
redgeographics
+39
  • romersl
    romersl
  • char_firstname
  • lindak
  • siennaatsafe
    siennaatsafe
  • redgeographics
    redgeographics
  • danilo_fme
    danilo_fme
  • asadamjad
  • warrendev
    warrendev
  • tcrossman
    tcrossman
  • vxn43
    vxn43
  • kennyo
    kennyo
  • canerakin
    canerakin
  • ranga_tolapi
    ranga_tolapi
  • milo89
    milo89
  • gbj1717
    gbj1717
  • nicohauri
    nicohauri
  • rhartley
  • bradr
    bradr
  • pangenib
  • mickleod
  • andre.utilit
  • pat_uow
    pat_uow
  • xabi
    xabi
  • alexvsn
  • sean_kurash
  • sacha
    sacha
  • davidlee
    davidlee
  • becchr
    becchr
  • anari
    anari
  • tschoppenhof
    tschoppenhof
  • geoal
    geoal
  • bozboswell
    bozboswell
  • reedwhit
    reedwhit
  • stevenjh
    stevenjh
  • tim.albert.vaa
    tim.albert.vaa
  • phoeffler
    phoeffler
  • veschwab
    veschwab
  • mapdog
  • michael.j
  • chris
  • cillingworth81
  • mavave
  • linda
  • p_c_20
    p_c_20

tim.albert.vaa
Contributor

This would eliminate the need to add an Attribute Creator after every port if I want to use these test results for things further in the process like "Groupby" Functions etc.

10 replies

erik_jan
Contributor
Forum|alt.badge.img+17
  • Contributor
  • January 12, 2017

You could use the AttributeCreator and use the option for conditional values.


fmelizard
Contributor
Forum|alt.badge.img+17
  • Contributor
  • January 13, 2017
This is an interesting idea for sure. I can see this being an interesting way of solving a long standing request as well. But @erik_jan is right that you can do a similar thing via Conditional setting. But still we'll consider this...

pat_uow
Contributor
Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Contributor
  • June 6, 2018

This would also be very useful after the change detector transformer instead of a separate attribute creator on each port. Attribute name to be set by the user, with values of unchanged, deleted and added ?


It'll be very handy option, please consider add this functionality to test filter


phoeffler
Contributor
Forum|alt.badge.img+5
  • Contributor
  • May 23, 2023

I agree that this would be helpful and is a sensible addition. As the TestFilter ports are not attributes, I do not see how to integrate the ports into the data flow with an AttributeCreator, even using Conditional Values? I checked attributes that were not exposed by default and couldn't find the ports there.


milo89
Enthusiast
Forum|alt.badge.img+16
  • Enthusiast
  • December 19, 2023

I completely understand that the AttributeCreator is able to generate similar results as I have a few workspaces with that exact functionality and it is often better if you need to generate multiple attributes based on a test.

That said, if they're processed differently based on the test/attribute I would generally be filtering straight after the AttributeCreator so this functionality could easily reduce the number of transformers required.

I see this as being similar to the '_predicate' attribute option from a SpatialFilter. You don't need to take the value but still available.


LizAtSafe
Safer
Forum|alt.badge.img+15
  • Safer
  • February 12, 2024
The following idea has been merged into this idea:

All the votes have been transferred into this idea.

p_c_20
Contributor
Forum|alt.badge.img+8
  • Contributor
  • October 25, 2024

Did this idea ever go anywhere? 


LizAtSafe
Safer
Forum|alt.badge.img+15
  • Safer
  • February 12, 2025
OpenGathering Interest

LizAtSafe
Safer
Forum|alt.badge.img+15
  • Safer
  • April 5, 2025
The following idea has been merged into this idea:

All the votes have been transferred into this idea.

Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings