Hi,
It might be tolerance / precision issue. Any particular reason for not using the Matcher?
David
maybe these missing bits have a larger _polygons like (>1,0)? Output by tester_8 Failed. (indicating there are more interactions, more polygons involved)
Or they actually do not match, don't touch at border. That would be output by Stringsearcher failed (as _polygons = <missing>)
Hi Gio,
Now I get the match I want after >1,0. Thank you.
Hi MAVA,
You already have the stringsearcher for the first value.
You can use tester to test for >1
If u want both values you can make stringsearcher look for regexp = (\\d),(\\d)
And expose matched_parts{0} and matched_parts{1}
You can expose maually or by rightclicking match_parts{} on expanded Matched on the stringsearcher.
You can then use test on both parts.
Hi Gio,
The matched_parts{0} and matched_parts{1} give far too less match results. The tester "> 1 give or = 1"and matched_parts{0} give the best results.