Hi,
The RasterCellCoercer adds column and row index to output features if you specify explicitely "Column Attribute" and "Row Attribute" parameters.
Takashi
Many thanks, Takashi, but I don't think going to vector is the way to do it, is it? After 5 minutes, it has only managed to get thruogh 1.5% of intermediate processing. Little wonder since I'm dealing with a raster of 738,480,000 cells!
There are transformers that allow calculations on cells but none (that I've found!) seem to allow incorporating the row or column number.
TIA.
The RasterCellCoercer tends to consume much time, but there aren't other transformers to relate with column/row number as far as I know. Using a RasterPropertiesExtractor, we can get the geometric raster properties (e.g. origin coordinates, number of rows / columns, extents etc.). Those properties can be used to calculate required values?