Question
Problem with SpatialFilter using intersects
I have a multiple base area that I am trying to use to add attributes to my parcel set. I am using the intersects selector and it works for most of it, but I keep getting additional parcels selected that do not intersect the base. Is there a way to get the program to not select these extraneous parcels?
This post is closed to further activity.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.
+36- Influencer
I've always had better results using the SpatialRelator with TestFilter afterward when there are multiple bases.
Hi Joan,
'INTERSECTS' should be interpreted broadly, it includes 'EQUALS', 'TOUCHES', 'CROSSES', 'OVERLAPS', 'CONTAINS' and 'WITHIN'. I suppose one or more relationships in those are unsuitable for your purpose. You can see the strict definitions of spatial relationships here: http://docs.safe.com/fme/html/FME_Transformers/Default.htm#Transformers/spatialrelations.htm
Takashi
Hi Joan,
I don't know your data, but maybe you have some multi part geometries that cause the strange results. So you can use the Deaggregator to resolve this. Afterward you can give the SpatialFilter another try...
Regards,
Stefan
Login to the community
No account yet? Create an account
An FME Account is required to contribute
LoginEnter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.