Skip to main content
Question

FME 2013 SP1 What's new Build Numbers

  • March 22, 2013
  • 2 replies
  • 20 views

mhab
Contributor
Forum|alt.badge.img+10
Hello

 

 

My question refers to the What's New Info which comes with FME 2013 SP1

 

 

The What's New in the "latest" official FME 2013 says for the latest change:

 

     BUILD 13264  20130207

 

 

The What's New for FME 2013 SP1 starts with the oldest entry:

 

     BUILD 13400 20121109

 

and ends with the latest entry:

 

     BUILD 13448 20130319

 

 

My questions:
  • Why is Build 13400 from Nov. 2012 when Build 13264 is from Feb 2013 ? I thought Build numbers are counted upwards ;-)
  • What happened between 13264 and 13400 ?

 

I' m sure there is a simple answer, but still I am confused ...

 

Michael
This post is closed to further activity.
It may be an old question, an answered question, an implemented idea, or a notification-only post.
Please check post dates before relying on any information in a question or answer.
For follow-up or related questions, please post a new question or idea.
If there is a genuine update to be made, please contact us and request that the post is reopened.

2 replies

fmelizard
Safer
Forum|alt.badge.img+21
  • Safer
  • March 26, 2013
Hi Michael,

 

 

Good question! Here's what is going on.

 

 

Before we released FME 2013, we "branched" the code and started a new codestream for FME 2013 SP1.  This happened in Nov.  So for a while, there were 2 FME 2013s being built -- the release one, and the SP1 "candidate/preview". Because we didn't know how many changes we'd make to the "release" one in Nov, we left a gap of build numbers and started the SP1 build numbers at 13400.  So, at some point within Safe's office, there was, for example, a buid 13250 and a build 13403 (numbers are made up).  We also made sure that any changes made in 132** were pushed up daily into 134**, so the 134** builds always had whatever was in the 132**, plus whatever else we were doing on SP1.  

 

 

So the gap from 13264 to 13400 is truly empty, which means we left ourselves plenty of room.

 

 

Note -- for SP2, there will be no build gap like this -- we are not branching and did not do concurrent development on SP1 and SP2.

 

 

And final note -- though I'm out of office I've heard that there is going to be a hotfix build for SP1 which will repair a regression for those authoring new custom xformers, so there will be one more Sp1 "hotfix" build to watch for.. and then that is it, just SP2 betas...

mhab
Contributor
Forum|alt.badge.img+10
  • Author
  • Contributor
  • March 26, 2013
Thanks Dale for the in depth clarification.

 

 

Michael